I Don’t Understand Why People Are Coming Here, Looking for Pictures of Hannah Giles in a Bikini.
September 16, 2009
I mean, thought I had been clear about this: I don’t have any pictures of Hannah Giles in a bikini. I don’t have any pictures of Hannah Giles nude. I don’t have any sex video clips of Hannah Giles.
So if you’re here looking for pictures of Hannah Giles and a bikini, you might try Desert Cat. He has picures of Hannah Giles and a string bikini. No: really.
Of course, I’m not sure why people think they are going to see more skin by looking at pictures of Hannah Giles in a bikini than they see on the ACORN tapes. (And, by the way, the San Berardino installment—at least, the first part—is available here.)
Posted in Uncategorized
Join the 
September 16th, 2009 at 11:31 am
Hot Hannah Giles Bikini Video — With TRAMPOLINE!
September 16th, 2009 at 11:58 am
Yikes. That should break yesterday’s record. Your stats show wall-to-wall “Hannah Giles”, and now they’re headed my way…
But how does one capitalize on a brazillion pervs searching for bikini pics?
Wait…
September 17th, 2009 at 5:25 am
I thought you had pictures of Hannah Giles sans bikini?
September 17th, 2009 at 7:40 am
You want to know why people are coming to your site looking for pics of Hannah Giles nude? Just take a moment and count how many times that phrase appears on your website. People are just googling the phrase.
But don’t worry, someone is already collecting pictures of Hannah Giles nude at http://glennbeckisatool.info
September 17th, 2009 at 10:19 am
That’s silly, Eric. How would Google know what I said about Hannah Giles and her bikini? Not that there’s anything wrong with her wearing a bikini. This is America, and if a girl can’t wear skimpy clothes here, where can she wear them?
But I’m just having a simple discussion here with my readers about Hannah Giles, and whether I would run a picture of her in a bikini, or black lingerie, if I had pictures of Hannah Giles in a bikini, or in black lingerie.
And you’re right about Glenn Beck: he’s a total tool. I mean, everytime he sets his sights on a public figure or a group, they . . . oh, wait. Never mind.
September 17th, 2009 at 10:27 am
What is silly about understanding how the internet works? Your post has “Hannah” and “Giles” and “bikini” right there in the title, and your post (counting the comments) have a dozen references to those same keywords. To Google’s spiders, your post is verrrry relevant to anyone looking for bikini pics of Ms. Giles. Of course, there are no pictures, but Google doesn’t know that.
September 17th, 2009 at 10:35 am
Google has spiders? Do they keep them in little glass jars, or are they just running around loose? Do they have a problem with cockroaches or something?
September 17th, 2009 at 10:39 am
Google’s spiders are everywhere! They crawl all over everyone’s websites and they’re very fastidious about noting keywords. Sadly, they are completely ineffective against cockroaches like Beck and O’Reilly.
September 17th, 2009 at 10:52 am
Eric, you’re talking too fast, and I can’t keep up with you. And how did we get onto the pest control thing? I”m confused.
September 17th, 2009 at 11:05 am
The title of your post was a statement that posed a question, so I answered it. The answer involved spiders, just not the eight-legged kind. Then you responded randomly by bringing up cockroaches and pest control. That was your comment. Don’t ask me how you got onto it.
Anyway, I’m still waiting for someone to post nude pics of Hannah Giles.
[Link fixed. --Blog Admin.]
September 18th, 2009 at 11:34 am
The conservative Google-bomb defense of Hannah Giles is working, LMA. God bless you! Hannah doesn’t understand it yet, but you’re an “angels unaware.”
September 18th, 2009 at 12:57 pm
I don’t think she understands yet, Eric. Perhaps you should spell it out for her one more time. Maybe this time you should incorporate interpretive dance.
Speaking of dancing, I’m so glad I didn’t find any nude pictures of Hannah Giles pole dancing with bikini girls. That would have been very disappointing.
September 18th, 2009 at 5:38 pm
Lovely idea! If I write about Hannah Giles in a bikini or even Hannah Giles in a thong would those spiders come over to my blog? But not the cockroaches. Eric P. can keep them.
Or would writing about Hannah Giles topless or Hannah Giles nude just keep those spiders running back to your post?
September 18th, 2009 at 6:04 pm
This google-bomb defense of Hannah Giles in a bikini is pretty cool. heh
September 18th, 2009 at 6:55 pm
Just add my name to the list of folks who do not want a beating from a beauty with a blackbelt. Even if I had some such picture, I’d rather live then publish it.
My thanks to Hannah for her brave work.
September 18th, 2009 at 7:58 pm
Actually, Stout. In order for the Google bomb to work, you have to accompany the key phrase with a link. So if I just said Hannah Giles nude and it was already on the page, Google wouldn’t notice it. But if I said Hannah Giles nude or Hannah Giles bikini then Google would notice every one of them. And every time someone responds to this page, it reloads the spiders. And the link ratings get higher and higher!
Isn’t it SEO exciting!?
[Links were incorrect, so they've been fixed. --Blog Admin.]
September 19th, 2009 at 12:57 am
This is definitely the best site for authentic HANNAH GILES FULL FRONTAL NUDITY NUDE BIKINI THONG NAKED TOPLESS HOT stuff!
Keep up the good work!
[Those who prefer lace wigs will still need to see Ace].
September 19th, 2009 at 6:25 am
Adjoran,
So Ace has pics of Hannah Giles in a bikini and wearing a lace wig?
September 19th, 2009 at 10:10 am
[...] Agree with Little Miss Attila By datechguy She says in this post I mean, thought I had been clear about this: I don’t have any pictures of Hannah Giles in a [...]
September 19th, 2009 at 10:30 am
[...] hun, but the McCainiacs have taken you for a ride. There are no photos of Hannah Giles nude. Any web [...]
September 26th, 2009 at 6:51 am
Cool……… not that I would mind seeing the lass unclothed but I saw this link on Pajamas Media and what ya’ll did ….. neat
September 27th, 2009 at 10:52 am
not that I would mind seeing the lass unclothed
JW, this is a blog, not the Oprah show. No need to confess your concupiscent fantasies.
September 27th, 2009 at 11:04 am
Remember: What’s in Stacy’s concupiscent fantasies, stays in Stacy’s concupiscent fantasies.
September 27th, 2009 at 12:27 pm
[...] don’t need more Bill Buckleys, we need more Bob Novaks, and he’s right. (Although Hannah Giles in a thong is a lot easier on the eyes than Novak ever [...]
September 27th, 2009 at 1:28 pm
Shocking Hannah Giles Confession!
September 27th, 2009 at 6:51 pm
[...] don’t need more Bill Buckleys, we need more Bob Novaks, and he’s right. (Although Hannah Giles in a thong is a lot easier on the eyes than Novak ever [...]
September 28th, 2009 at 4:01 am
You mean you don’t have Hannah Giles in a thong,
or Hannah Giles with a bong?
not even Hannah Giles in a bikini,
or preferably skinny-
dipping?
What about pictures of Hannah Giles nude,
or even better Hannah Giles doing something lewd?
Come on! At least some pics of Hannah Giles having sex,
ideally with somebody’s (now ex)-
husband?
September 28th, 2009 at 8:29 am
Aw, you poor whackjobs are so cute. You keep trying and trying to Google bomb phrases while having no clue about its effects. Sure, if anyone does a search for those phrases they’re going to end up at the wrong place. But have you thought about who, exactly, would be doing that search? No. You just keep doing what you were told to do without stopping to consider how your actions will *actually* effect the world. Typical neo-cons. Cute but dumb, and not always cute.
Nice try, though! Thanks for all the traffic. :o)
September 28th, 2009 at 11:41 am
Oh my God, this is the most hilarious exchange I’ve ever read.
Eric P. Metze (the “p” is for Putz) has got to the biggest dolt I’ve ever seen in print!
Democrats really do not have any sense of humor.
It explains EVERYTHING.
I am still a little puzzled, though, as to why I’m not getting any hit traffic on my nude photos of Michelle Obama.
September 28th, 2009 at 3:58 pm
DAF — I can explain that…
As for Eric…?
September 28th, 2009 at 6:42 pm
Jesus, Mary and Joseph!
And I thought her tacky fruit dress for the Medal of Honor ceremony was tasteless!
If she walked through a trailer park looking like that, they’d throw her out for making them look bad.
Man!
Nothing shows up fat hips like bad shorts.
I think she’s smuggling Sandy Berger in there.