More on Child-Rape Chic

Date September 29, 2009

Tommy Christopher on Whoopi Goldberg’s descent into a peculiarly Hollywood brand of insanity.

And, no, kids: the girl’s mother was not on-site, and she did not take her daughter to Jack Nicholson’s house for a photography session/lame attempt at seduction/rape. Polanski picked her up at her house. The girl had had a notion that she should take a friend along for the shoot, but Polanski was in a hurry when he came by the house.

And it wouldn’t have mattered if the mother had been there, by the way: mothers cannot give consent on behalf of their 13-year-old daughters for either vaginal or anal intercourse when the girls themselves are saying “no, no,” even through a drug- and alcohol-induced haze.

Under the circumstances, “sex with a minor” was a freakin’ gift from heaven that Polanski should have been kissing the ground for.

What the fuck is wrong with people?

Ed Morrissey has more. As does Jim Lindgren. LaShawn Barber. Neo-Neocon. And Insty, who remarks, “You can tell a lot about a governing class from who[m] it’s willing to cover for.”

Indeed.

2 Responses to “More on Child-Rape Chic”

  1. Jill said:

    A couple more:
    http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/09/28/polanski_arrest/
    http://moderateleft.com/?p=5752

  2. Foxfier said:

    Upside: none of the libs I know in RL are defending this garbage.

    Downside: holy hand grenades, there are a lot of lefties that like their little-girl-rape.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Check Spelling
Activate Spell Check while Typing

Bad Behavior has blocked 1267 access attempts in the last 7 days.