I Got Hooked on Hung Last Night.
November 8, 2009
Of course, I don’t really agree with the premise that penis size is a critical factor in a heterosexual encounter—that most straight women are size queens.
But any series in which one of the main characters is a poetess who is attractive, but not beautiful, and likes to bake gets my vote.
In fact, I stayed up too late watching all of them, and had to re-schedule mass with my husband on account of it.
Posted in

Join the 



November 8th, 2009 at 7:02 pm
Do they still say “poetess”? I’ve pretty much given up that word in favor of the gender-unspecific “poet,” but then again I’ve been known to toss out terms like “editrix,” so obviously no one died and left me in charge of the Usage Guide.
November 8th, 2009 at 9:39 pm
Sorry, Anne Heche is a dealbreaker.
But, you made me look.
November 9th, 2009 at 2:53 am
Yeah a show about a straight male prostitute is realistic. They should show him eating Ramen noodles every night because of the low salaries in the big cities, especially with the bump that goes along with coaching HS basketball in addition to his History gig. The hung part is icing on the cake. With an average 5 and 1/2 ” to the cervix, you’d think a Pap smear would clear that from most women’s bucket list. Wouldn’t a second job at McDonald’s prove more lucrative? Or raking the tumble weed at the site of Heidi Fleiss’ Nevada “stud farm” that only catered to women?
How about a show set in the immediate future where everyone is so much happier as a result of the $12, 000 in additional taxes (including higher energy prices) at the end of the first act of the Democrats’ reign of terror? It’s sure to be
greenlighted. Early ‘magination is like a yeast infection. Best to get on the bandwagon now.
November 9th, 2009 at 7:28 am
“Of course, I don’t really agree with the premise that penis size is a critical factor in a heterosexual encounter—that most straight women are size queens.”
That’s your story and you’re sticking to it.
November 9th, 2009 at 8:27 am
The show’s premise doesn’t seem that unreasonable. EVERY woman I’ve ever known in the Biblical sense, without exception, said that size made a difference. The consensus was usually that the “Large” category (7″-9″) was ideal, but anything above that was nearly always awkward and painful.
November 9th, 2009 at 9:53 am
There’s such a thing as small enough to make things challenging, so there’s probably a minimal size that makes the act reasonably convenient, but I just don’t see any reason that pain should be part of the equation in sex. However, I do understand that some people like pain along with their pleasure as an intensifier–and more power to ‘em.
But oral is way more important than any attributes of the male genitalia. Too bad HBO leaves it to the villainess to point that out.
November 9th, 2009 at 1:01 pm
Size allows a greater range of movement and positions, ones where most of the length isn’t really used. One’s where the “average” would slip out.
The only thing women ever buy is “arm candy” for social and business functions–to impress their friends and rivals and to make ex’s jealous. Overall looks, social skills and intelligent conversation are the principal requirements. And looking successful and being able to create a convincing backstory and think on your feet so that no one would ever suspect that you were “rented.”
November 10th, 2009 at 3:27 am
And Cynthia, wouldn’t you rather be with Portia De Rossi anyway? I would.
Sometimes the glitter is gold.