Of Course . . .

by Little Miss Attila on November 10, 2009

I don’t remember the part in the Bible where it says not to make videos of one’s most private, personal moments of . . . intense self-care.

Not that I remember such being recommended, either, of course—in the Old Testament, or in the New. And such a project might well run afoul of the recommendations toward female modesty. And potentially the exhortations for women to remain relatively quiet (I took the precaution of crossing those out in my Bible) . . . but then, I haven’t seen the vid, either.

But I’ll bet it’s hot.

{ 11 comments… read them below or add one }

Darleen Click November 10, 2009 at 7:23 pm

what sleaze of an ex-boyfriend decided to shop that tape to the opposing lawyers? She may have been a stupid teen (redundant I know…doublly so when “in love”) but we know what he is.

(now, there are reasons I won’t run for public office ….)

Reply

Darrell November 10, 2009 at 11:45 pm

Does that video show her engaging in gay marriage? No? I don’t see the problem then.

If you were told that the only copy was destroyed, the you could even honestly say that no such tape exists. Note to women–The probability of a man actually destroying such a tape is too small to measure. It’s more likely that the world ended yesterday.

Reply

Little Miss Attila November 11, 2009 at 6:34 am

I had some stills of an ex that were compromising to him, and no longer did the job for me, so I destroyed them. This was in the days when one had to get rid of the negatives as well, and I didn’t have a shredder. So it took a while to cut things up into small enough pieces that nothing would be recognizeable.

But you know women: we’re not visual in the same way guys are.

Reply

Gordon November 11, 2009 at 8:18 am

You are such a dirty girl, Miss A.

I had commented at Monique Stuart’s place that I thought it was a hoax, because TMZ’s claims that it was “too racy” were, not believable. I had not considered that that the clip could be, legally, child prOn.

Reply

Charlie (Colorado) November 11, 2009 at 8:43 am

Oh my God, a Christian who masturbates. Who woulda thunk it.

Reply

Little Miss Attila November 11, 2009 at 8:53 am

Next, they’ll be accusing us of excreting the food we consume. Which no female does anyway–much less a Christian female.

Reply

Gregory November 11, 2009 at 4:57 pm

Charlie: What, were we not supposed to? I don’t recall the chunk of the New Testament that forbids it (OT, yes, but you know)…

Granted, we’re not supposed to be looking at pix of *real* people, but you know, anime and doujinshi; heck, there are things that will destroy your childhood memories of Hanna Barbara and Warner Brothers and Walt Disney…

Reply

Mike November 11, 2009 at 7:13 pm

Gregory,

To my knowledge, the only time masturbation is mentioned at all in the Bible is in the story of Onan (Genesis 38:8-10). In that tale, Onan is ordered by God to impregnate his brother Her’s widow Tamar, but instead “spills his seed” outside of her womb. He’s slain by God for this, but it’s pretty obvious that his disobedience, rather than the act itself, is what angered the Big Guy.

Reply

Darrell November 11, 2009 at 9:07 pm

Let me make it perfectly clear that Carrie Prejean has never videotaped herself taking a dump. Not that any woman has been known to do such a thing, mind you, either dumping or taping it. Harvey Levin of TMZ has not commented about whether he is in the possession of any such tape or whether or not such a tape is his principal source of sexual release. He has never commented on Rosie’s legendary “four-flusher” or the role that has played in his life. He has, however, never denied its existence.

Reply

Little Miss Attila November 11, 2009 at 9:20 pm

Well, then: that makes the situation pretty clear . . .

Reply

I R A Darth Aggie November 12, 2009 at 7:41 am

So, how old was she then? are the organizers of the pagent in posession of child pr0n? do they have a valid model’s release??

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: