Like, Sarah Palin’s.
AllahP has written about this [and follow his link; he has some great vid of Palin discussing the oil spill, and the need for executive leadership on energy], as have Insty (in passing), and Tigerhawk. T-Hawk is quite quotable, so here goes:
Sarah Palin’s breasts are suddenly the objects of great interest on the left, not because of their obvious appeal, but as an opportunity to accuse her of having enhanced them with implants. This controversy follows an earlier obsession with Sarah Palin’s medical care, the election-year spat over whether she is indeed the mother of her son Trig or (alternatively) was reckless in flying back to Alaska to give birth to him. . . . The boobery need no further reminder that the left disdains their sense of aesthetic, but if liberals want to beat them over the head with it, fine. This may, in the end, be Palin’s greatest contribution to conservative political fortunes: She suckers the chattering left in to reminding everybody that they are, well, snots.
Second, we note that privacy in medical matters is the legal foundation of the Constitutional right to abortion, per Roe v. Wade. This right to privacy is apparently so sacred that (so says the left) it is reasonable to sacrifice fetuses to defend it. One would think that the left, therefore, would be reluctant to intrude on even Sarah Palin’s medical privacy. Of course, that would require some measure of intellectual honesty, which is apparently beyond the capacity of many liberals when Sarah Palin is involved.
I have no desire to go examine the pictures that have generated the speculation, because when push comes to shove, I don’t really care. If she did get “work” done, it’s probably for private reasons, since a good bra provides as much lift as a girl really needs for public appearances, and Sarah’s boobs were never that gravity-bound. And unless Wonkette has contacts in the plastic surgery business, a new bra is a very likely source of the speculation.
Mostly, the whole thing makes me giggle, because I’m wondering what part of Palin’s body the Left will fixate on next.
UPDATE: Ah; so we want to Google-bomb the Sarah Palin implant traffic. The thing to remember is that one must work Sarah Palin’s breasts into the post as many times as one possibly can. Also, Sarah Palin’s jugs, Sarah Palin’s knockers, Sarah Palin’s tits, Sarah Palin’s cleavage, and Sarah Palin’s boobs. I wouldn’t leave out Sarah Palin plastic surgery, or Sarah Palin enhancement.
But you know what? I’ve actually got a fair number of hits over the past year and a half from “Todd Palin shirtless.” Run the pic, and the world will beat a path to your blog . . .
{ 2 trackbacks }
{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }
These [her facebook communiques]–and Sarah’s three endorsements, two of which went on to victory and a third that came within a hair’s bredth with a late nod when it looked like a runaway for the eventual victor–are what the Left is trying to distract us from. Now, Sarah’s breasts are always a welcome distraction, it should be said. So maybe that “neighbor” they sent to live next door can come up with something for us to ponder.
Of course it’s “breadth.” No need to ration that a’s. . .
Ah, think back to the good ol’ days, of you and I praising great breasts…
RG
Noted and linked with usual gratitude:
http://viewedfromtheright.blogspot.com/2010/06/more-emergency-rule-5-toni-braxton.html
-LTB
(Mammalian Protuberances Rule!)