Stacy McCain: Technique Isn’t Important for Men in the Sack.

by Little Miss Attila on June 21, 2010

Right. ‘Cause women are just that simple to satisfy.

When he was single, and conducting his “research,” he was either a natural—or oblivious when his lady friends awakened in the middle of the night to finish themselves off so they could sleep better.

{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }

Robert Stacy McCain June 21, 2010 at 3:48 pm: Silly. Do you think Angelina is waking up in the middle of the night?

Reply
vanderleun June 21, 2010 at 4:09 pm: It’s never a good idea to get too far ahead of your legend.

Reply
richard mcenroe June 21, 2010 at 4:17 pm: In the immortal words of Robert Heinlein and Lazarus Long: “Ladies, if he’s not doing it right, bite his nose and show him how!”

Reply
thatIsRatherCloseToHome June 21, 2010 at 4:22 pm: That is rather close to home.

Reply
ck June 21, 2010 at 4:58 pm: Maybe he could have finished you off the first time if the begging and talking about your relationship with your mother hadn’t taken the wind out of his sails.

Reply
richard mcenroe June 21, 2010 at 8:43 pm: If the guy’s begging that obnoxiously and already worrying about your mother, the sex probably ain’t worth it.

Reply
datechguy June 21, 2010 at 9:33 pm: The question really becomes this: Presuming we are dealing with a married couple is the woman having sex because her husband is in the mood or because she wants sex?

I maintain that most men can usually tell the difference and, depending on temperament, will choose their technique accordingly.

Since men by nature welcome sex whenever it is offered it would seem to me the smart thing is to concern yourself with your partner’s satisfaction. The more likely you do, the more likely the frequency will increase and the less likely you will be having a demoralizing evening of “let’s get it over with” sex.

Reply
Little Miss Attila June 21, 2010 at 9:46 pm: Obviously, I’m not talking about marriage. But the principle may apply there, as well: Stacy is projecting the visual nature of male sexuality onto women.

It doesn’t matter what the guy looks like if he cannot intuit, or engineer, the important stuff.

As for the myth of the 24/7 man, well . . . if such men were that common, there wouldn’t be much of a market for Hitachi Magic Wands, would there?

Reply
datechguy June 21, 2010 at 10:06 pm: Well that raises the question. How much of a market is there for the Hitachi Magic Wand?

Reply
I R A Darth Aggie June 22, 2010 at 5:25 am: I wondered where the Hitachi logo came from…it was somewhat disconcerting to see it there, but I guess this is a good thing??

Reply
Little Miss Attila June 22, 2010 at 6:07 am: [This is Darrell’s comment that I accidentally erased last night.]

How much of a market? If it didn’t exist, we wouldn’t need an additional electric generation capacity until 2086. I probably will get in trouble for leaking this because it is top secret, but every US sub had to have an extensive upgrade of its electrical systems prior to the arrival of the first female crewmembers. Hillary’s commemorative 660-volt, 50 A version, presented to her by Hitachi Heavy Industries in 1996 was the source of the Ultra-Low Frequency vibrations drawing complaints as far away as Wisconsin–not the ELF submarine communication network. Roughly 1/3 of all batteries are clandistinely re-directed to DC vibrator applications. The list goes on and on. I don’t know if Faith Popcorn said it, but no one will ever go wanting if you invest all your dollars in the Jill-Off market.

Reply
Roxeanne de Luca June 22, 2010 at 6:21 am: I’ve often wondered what is so hard for men to understand: try a little consideration.

As a woman who has dated more than her share of Neanderthals, I’m here to tell you that it’s usually very easy for women to refuse sex – no Catholic principles necessary. The lack of consideration for my emotional, spiritual, and, yes, physical well-being is a deal-breaker.

Reply
Texan99 June 22, 2010 at 7:27 am: “Stacy is projecting the visual nature of male sexuality onto women.” That’s it, right there. They also may be projecting the somewhat, shall we say, automatic nature of their satisfaction onto women, and hoping that a woman’s response can be converted into more of a simple button-pushing affair if some magic principle can be discovered.

Which is why it’s so important to find a guy who gets it (it’s not rocket science, it’s just not the same as guys), and then hang on to him forever.

Reply
Darrell June 22, 2010 at 3:11 pm: There are no accidents!

Reply

Stacy McCain: Technique Isn’t Important for Men in the Sack.

Search this site

Links and Things

Pages

Archives

New Posts

Site Admin