. . . despite the metal in the underwire—and that bit of Koch-tainted Lycra in the cups. But judge for yourself:
I could be wrong; perhaps they are hemispherical menaces.
RightGirl, the difference between pet rocks and carbon-hysteria schemes is that the latter destroy industry, and tend to take the economy down with it.
This lingerie-related matter should probably be referred to the Breast-Staring Institute for further review.
Via Smitty, whose role at the Institute appears to be in a support capacity.
{ 5 trackbacks }
{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }
Odd… ‘hemispherical menaces’ is how I have long referred to my wife’s chesticular region. Well – that or ‘dual output infant nourishment system’, depending on what developmental stage the children were in.
Were we both single, that would be quite friendly to my environment. But since we’re neither one available, I’ll just admire from a decent distance.
Whoot! Be nice to those sweater puppies, young lady!
Further, Deponent sayeth not, so as not to incriminate anyone in print. Most notably myself, since my wife tends to follow my browser history around on occasion.
“What were you doing in a .50 Barrett rifle forum for an hour and a half? You don’t need one of those!” After that one, I started being a bit more discreet.
Or not, as the case may be, but nonetheless, you are doing just fine, and high caliber at that!
Does my smaller bosom mean that my bra has a smaller carbon footprint? and is that an argument for keeping up my running regimen, or for giving the middle finger to Al Gore and the rest of the whack-job environmentalists by getting a boob job?
NO BOOB JOBS!
Large or small, wide or lean, natural is best when seen!
Robert ‘Bob’ Belvedere,
Rule 5 Mojo Master
And, fercryinoutloud, “no boob jobs” includes NO REDUCTIONS!
I was hopeful that the Republican alternative medical care plan would outlaw this purposeless, mutilating procedure which is nothing less than another form of abortion.
Roxeanne, these decorative items were given to me in compensation for my squeaky little voice. If I had your lovely sexy-yet-ladylike tones, I wouldn’t need ’em. (And I’m positive I spend more on running bras than you do, too.)
Actually, I’ve considered breast-reduction surgery in 20 years or so–but even in retirement it seems like a bit of a bait-and-switch to pull on my husband, so unless I have really bad back problems, I’ll likely just muddle along.
Hey, if you can’t be an athlete. . .
I thought you weren’t going to post cheesecake until the paypal donations flooded in.
You have a lovely voice, LMA – especially when you’re routing Stacy.
Bob, can we try that again in Haiku?
Roxe: Gesundheit!