This is not acceptable.
And if someone brings up male circumcision in this context, I’m going to go ballistic. There are no extra folds of skin in the female genitalia. One can argue circumcision either way, but it is not comparable to female genital mutilation: all we have down there are unholy numbers of nerve endings packed into nearly no space.
Female genital mutilation is unhumane, period.
; ?>/images/feed.png)


{ 3 trackbacks }
{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }
I would dearly love to see what these “people” would do if someone was mutilating white girls’ genitals. What if, say, the Quiverfull did it? All they’re saying is that little brown and black girls aren’t entitled to the same protection, or to be full citizens, even. Urgh.
Go ballistic, then. There are no “extra” folds of skin in the male genitalia, either. The part you’re happy to dub “extra” has as many nerve endings as do your hands. Are you willing to do without those never endings too?
Being almost supernaturally clumsy, I’ve done things to my hands that, had someone done them to my labia, would have me calling Amnesty International.
Thank you for differentiating between male circumcision and female mutilation. I’ve already seen respectable people lump them together.
I would like to be shocked that the far left can’t even defend this most basic of womens’ rights, but I’m not.
They went bankrupt so long ago nothing surprises me about the left anymore.
Speaking as a father of two and as someone who is circumcised (I know, TMI), it’s worked out very well for me.
Anyway.. it depends on the doctor doing the nick too. Not everyone can find the man in the boat.